<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and Microsoft Business Intelligence- talk about tweet share</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datamartist.com/twitter-and-microsoft-business-intelligence-talk-about-tweet-share/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datamartist.com/twitter-and-microsoft-business-intelligence-talk-about-tweet-share</link>
	<description>Reduce cost with self serve data transformation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Standen</title>
		<link>http://www.datamartist.com/twitter-and-microsoft-business-intelligence-talk-about-tweet-share/comment-page-1#comment-460</link>
		<dc:creator>James Standen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datamartist.com/?p=2329#comment-460</guid>
		<description>Perhaps MS will.

I was thinking about this, and its only a matter of time- or maybe its already happened- to have companies using natural language parsing bots that locate relevant tweets, make analysis and either reply automatically, or generate proposed tweet spam that is quickly reviewed by &quot;paid tweeters&quot;.

Spam is everywhere, that&#039;s for certain.  Twitter does not even have a simple captcha system for signups, so there is a lot of gaming going on as far as I can see.

But as you point out, there are lots of positive uses too- like everything on the net, I think in the long run quality will win out. 

Thanks for the comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps MS will.</p>
<p>I was thinking about this, and its only a matter of time- or maybe its already happened- to have companies using natural language parsing bots that locate relevant tweets, make analysis and either reply automatically, or generate proposed tweet spam that is quickly reviewed by "paid tweeters".</p>
<p>Spam is everywhere, that's for certain.  Twitter does not even have a simple captcha system for signups, so there is a lot of gaming going on as far as I can see.</p>
<p>But as you point out, there are lots of positive uses too- like everything on the net, I think in the long run quality will win out. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>http://www.datamartist.com/twitter-and-microsoft-business-intelligence-talk-about-tweet-share/comment-page-1#comment-459</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 23:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datamartist.com/?p=2329#comment-459</guid>
		<description>Was at a meeting last night talking about social media &amp; how it gets used. 

Interesting point was that many companies now have PR staff or consultants who have a full-time job on twitter. One guy talked about a local telco, who had a couple of staff looking for tweets about the opposition (telco) service. If they saw a possible &#039;switch&#039; opportunity then they would jump in and say something like &quot;yeah, I had that problem &amp; switched to service Y which is far better. You should do that&quot;  

I have issues with this; Twitter is great when I see a developer talking about what works for them but if the tweet is a paid for advert then how can I know it is real? This is more like email spam, instead of companies listening to customers talking via twitter and learning from it.

I can only imagine how much time/money MS is putting into Twitter to get the cloud you see. Perhaps they should just buy the company?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was at a meeting last night talking about social media &amp; how it gets used. </p>
<p>Interesting point was that many companies now have PR staff or consultants who have a full-time job on twitter. One guy talked about a local telco, who had a couple of staff looking for tweets about the opposition (telco) service. If they saw a possible 'switch' opportunity then they would jump in and say something like "yeah, I had that problem &amp; switched to service Y which is far better. You should do that"  </p>
<p>I have issues with this; Twitter is great when I see a developer talking about what works for them but if the tweet is a paid for advert then how can I know it is real? This is more like email spam, instead of companies listening to customers talking via twitter and learning from it.</p>
<p>I can only imagine how much time/money MS is putting into Twitter to get the cloud you see. Perhaps they should just buy the company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
