<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making rapid prototypes for data warehouse ETL jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datamartist.com/making-rapid-prototypes-for-data-warehouse-etl-jobs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datamartist.com/making-rapid-prototypes-for-data-warehouse-etl-jobs</link>
	<description>Reduce cost with self serve data transformation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:04:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Standen</title>
		<link>http://www.datamartist.com/making-rapid-prototypes-for-data-warehouse-etl-jobs/comment-page-1#comment-1518</link>
		<dc:creator>James Standen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 19:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datamartist.com/?p=3022#comment-1518</guid>
		<description>Nope- that percentage is from my experience, and experiences reported to me by others.  I worked for about 6 years on various projects, and kept budget figures for all of them (always trying to improve the estimation side)- overall the ETL was consistently in that range.   I&#039;ve heard others offer the same figure, or concur, but no hard data.  Which is a pity, because I was always facing exactly what you described- management was always willing to pay for the flash on the front end, but wanted to know why the data transformation was so expensive.   

The problem, of course, with trying to compare from project to project is that they are all different- very complex front ends in situations where there is only one source system, data quality is good and a robust master data process has been in place will change the ratio significantly, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope- that percentage is from my experience, and experiences reported to me by others.  I worked for about 6 years on various projects, and kept budget figures for all of them (always trying to improve the estimation side)- overall the ETL was consistently in that range.   I've heard others offer the same figure, or concur, but no hard data.  Which is a pity, because I was always facing exactly what you described- management was always willing to pay for the flash on the front end, but wanted to know why the data transformation was so expensive.   </p>
<p>The problem, of course, with trying to compare from project to project is that they are all different- very complex front ends in situations where there is only one source system, data quality is good and a robust master data process has been in place will change the ratio significantly, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Folkerts</title>
		<link>http://www.datamartist.com/making-rapid-prototypes-for-data-warehouse-etl-jobs/comment-page-1#comment-1515</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Folkerts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:09:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datamartist.com/?p=3022#comment-1515</guid>
		<description>Do you have numbers or references to back up your 70% figure?  My management is focused on the features of the analytics server and is giving minimal resources to ETL.  I would love to show them industry averages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have numbers or references to back up your 70% figure?  My management is focused on the features of the analytics server and is giving minimal resources to ETL.  I would love to show them industry averages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

